One of the most interesting books I've read in a long while. In short, modern science owes a debt to medieval theology that many people today would like to forget. Unlike both modern militant atheists and religious fundamentalists, the world of medieval theological inquiry was surprisingly tolerant of different ideas.
Many of the popular images of the medieval Church as having held back the development of science are simply wrong. While religious teachings did sometimes clash directly with scientific discoveries, most people were happy to interpret the Bible figuratively rather than literally when the evidence was sufficient. The famous trials of Bruno and Galileo were a lot more complicated than is often depicted today - Bruno was a nutcase, and Galileo got into trouble more for insulting the Pope than he did for his observations.
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review : The Brain
I interrupt my mythology book reviews to turn to the completely different matter of neuroscience. David Eagleman's Livewired was one of ...
-
Where Americans think Ukraine is These are the guesses of 2066 Americans as to where Ukraine is. Only 1 in 6 were correct. Presumably the...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
-
Of course you can prove a negative. In one sense this can be the easiest thing in the world : your theory predicts something which doesn...
the invisible college, alchemy... there was a lot of tolerance that stem from the fact that people hid their beliefs and used iniciatic groups and official institutions to hide and survive.
ReplyDeleteForgotten is the fact that the first universities in Europe were in practice an effort to control scholars.