Adventures in Pseudoscience, part 3/3
Long-winded rant about why people believe science is dogmatic despite the fact that it just isn't. Summary :
- There are lots of things science doesn't know, and we probably need to say this a bit more often.
- Most pseudoscience is simply wrong. The fact that occasionally some seemingly outlandish ideas turn out to be correct doesn't avoid the fact that most "alternative" models are at odds with pretty well-tested ideas (and, sometimes, established facts).
- Saying "it's arrogant to think such-and-such" (like, "we can't be the only intelligent life in the Universe") is wrong - evidence, not opinions, determines what's arrogant and what's not.
- Actually, it IS only a theory. Attempts to define theory as being the same as fact are completely wrong. This only serves to confuse everybody. You can't disprove facts.
- Evidence is not the same as proof. Skepticism is not the same as denial. Science is generally skeptical of new results even when it supports mainstream ideas.
- In general, the media like to say, "science proves X" while in reality this is rarely the case. Never trust new results.
- Unfortunately genuinely arrogant scientists are very popular in the media, and can give the wrong impression of the way science is done.
There, that should do it.
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Dune part two : first impressions
I covered Dune : Part One when it came out, so it seems only fair I should cover the "concluding" part as well. I'm gonna do ...
-
This is nice video which attempts to solve why the world is sometimes such a crappy place and obvious solutions don't get implemented. I...
-
Three rules for any article on AI : 1) AI does not yet have the the same kind of understanding as human intelligence. 2) There is no guar...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
Okay, the mirror thing was better than I expected, for an admittedly odd value of 'better'.
ReplyDeleteGood stuff on 'theory', by the way.