I didn't learn critical thinking in university physics courses, I learned it in high school English.
On the importance of humanities classes in developing a healthy level of skepticism :
"English education covered something that science did not : understanding what articles really mean, and what their intended effect is. When hearing someone expound the latest scientific theory, understanding if and how you're being manipulated is every bit as critical as understanding what the evidence itself suggests. That's something science classes never cover.Being able to analyse a poem isn't the point - the point is you're taught to analyse meaning and assess implication. Or, in its simplest form, not to take things at face value."
As for the cat, you'll have to read the article to understand that one.
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
An Astonishing Level of Humanisation
I've mentioned the difficulties of both promoting/censoring violent action on social media before and I can't really think of much ...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
Where Americans think Ukraine is These are the guesses of 2066 Americans as to where Ukraine is. Only 1 in 6 were correct. Presumably the...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
Possibly the journalists had English lessons like mine, where we analysed poems, read through Shakespeare painfully and slowly, and never learnt any critical thinking whatsoever.
ReplyDeleteMy sister had crappy English teachers too. Probably explains why she watches Big Brother...
ReplyDelete