In a public lecture in Prague today, Martin Rees made the oft-repeated statement that biology is far more complicated than astronomy. A frog is much more complex than a star or a galaxy.
If that's so, I'd like to hire a biologist and see how they get on. :D
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review : Norse Myths and Tales (II)
As per usual, a single-part post just isn't going to cut it. Having ranted at considerable length against the Norse sagas (of Flame Tree...
-
I've noticed that some people care deeply about the truth, but come up with batshit crazy statements. And I've caught myself rationa...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
-
"The price quoted by Tesla does not include installation of the unit. To this needs to be added the cost of installing solar panels to ...
Frog: 16,000,000 neurons [1]
ReplyDeletePentium III Coppermine: 21,000,000 transistors [2]
Stars in Milky Way: 300,000,000,000 [3]
Not that you can compare 1 neuron to a transistor or a star just some interesting numbers
[1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_by_number_of_neurons
[2] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor_count
[3] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way