"The LHC cost each British citizen £1.65 in 2015. I’ll bet you spend more on peanuts. Cancer research comes to about £2.80 per person, yet cancer costs us £250 per person per year. That’s not very good accounting. We each are taxed around £134 on all publicly funded research per year, equivalent to only 0.44% of GDP. This is the lowest level of investment of any of the G8 countries. If your measure is Nobel prizes, then we have more in the sciences than all bar America. The comprehensive spending review looms just over the horizon, and the science budget is set, like so many other public endeavours, to be cut by up to 40%."
"For me there is no conflict between the arts and science, we need and thrive on both. But here’s the rub: art blossoms when economies are strong, and doesn’t itself generate great wealth. Pure scientific research is a public investment and builds economies. Cutting the science budget is pruning the roots of a tree."
Originally shared by Jenny Winder
By Dr Adam Rutherford
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/nov/01/science-is-vital-british-legacy-contact-mp
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whose cloud is it anyway ?
I really don't understand the most militant climate activists who are also opposed to geoengineering . Or rather, I think I understand t...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
For all that I know the Universe is under no obligation to make intuitive sense, I still don't like quantum mechanics. Just because some...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
Art generates income to wealthy indiduals who invest and speculate in it. Many happen to work in government...
ReplyDelete