"The LHC cost each British citizen £1.65 in 2015. I’ll bet you spend more on peanuts. Cancer research comes to about £2.80 per person, yet cancer costs us £250 per person per year. That’s not very good accounting. We each are taxed around £134 on all publicly funded research per year, equivalent to only 0.44% of GDP. This is the lowest level of investment of any of the G8 countries. If your measure is Nobel prizes, then we have more in the sciences than all bar America. The comprehensive spending review looms just over the horizon, and the science budget is set, like so many other public endeavours, to be cut by up to 40%."
"For me there is no conflict between the arts and science, we need and thrive on both. But here’s the rub: art blossoms when economies are strong, and doesn’t itself generate great wealth. Pure scientific research is a public investment and builds economies. Cutting the science budget is pruning the roots of a tree."
Originally shared by Jenny Winder
By Dr Adam Rutherford
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/nov/01/science-is-vital-british-legacy-contact-mp
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review : Norse Myths and Tales (II)
As per usual, a single-part post just isn't going to cut it. Having ranted at considerable length against the Norse sagas (of Flame Tree...
-
I've noticed that some people care deeply about the truth, but come up with batshit crazy statements. And I've caught myself rationa...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
-
"The price quoted by Tesla does not include installation of the unit. To this needs to be added the cost of installing solar panels to ...
Art generates income to wealthy indiduals who invest and speculate in it. Many happen to work in government...
ReplyDelete