They're going to need a man walking in front of them waving a red flag, in case they scare the horses.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35131538
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review : Pagan Britain
Having read a good chunk of the original stories, I turn away slightly from mythological themes and back to something more academical : the ...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
I've noticed that some people care deeply about the truth, but come up with batshit crazy statements. And I've caught myself rationa...
-
"The price quoted by Tesla does not include installation of the unit. To this needs to be added the cost of installing solar panels to ...
Google criticizes... Yeah, and what happens if there is a software glitch (like that has NOT been known to happen, and the car runs over someone???). Google cars are NOT perfect, no matter what Schmidt wants to think.
ReplyDeleteAFAIK the car has never run over anyone and the only problems it's caused are by being over-cautious.
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to be better than most humans.
_ "We've seen in our own testing that drivers can't be trusted to dip in and out of the task of driving when the car is encouraging them to sit back and relax," said Mr Urmson._
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely. The odds of someone not actively engaged in driving being able to react quickly enough is so remote to make this legislation useless anyway. In a few years this law will already feel archaic.
+I know I'm not perfect, but think I'm better than most humans_. But, then again, that could be a ego thing, or a programming glitch. lol #sarcasm
ReplyDelete