Percentage of research papers concluding that "more research is needed" 1960-2015, found on the internet, source unknown.
Probably because usually more research is needed.
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Philosophers be like, "?"
In the Science of Discworld books the authors postulate Homo Sapiens is actually Pan Narrans, the storytelling ape. Telling stories is, the...
-
This is nice video which attempts to solve why the world is sometimes such a crappy place and obvious solutions don't get implemented. I...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
Three rules for any article on AI : 1) AI does not yet have the the same kind of understanding as human intelligence. 2) There is no guar...
Subtitles read: "we want more funding."
ReplyDelete... surely not ! :)
ReplyDeleteWell, the more you know, the more you realise how much you don't know ...
ReplyDeleteSimon Barton Oh good point ! I just blindly assumed it meant a factor of 0.3 so 30%.
ReplyDeleteSomething tells me the scale is supposed to read 30%. I have found the statement "need more research" in almost all papers I have read.
ReplyDeleteApparently it is 0.3%.
ReplyDeleteTo extrapolate: in the year 17000 they will write "all research still lies ahead!"
I'm going to step in it...ok, do the above and below median clusters correlate with: i) expenditures ii) tech advances or, iii) government or other market demands?
ReplyDeleteWish I could find the original citation for this semi - questionable graph. Cheers!
Ian Rawlings that would be tantamount to "and not a thing was learned..." rather embarrassing. Doesn't do much for the CV. Not much of a conversation starter over drinks, either.
ReplyDelete