This is ongoing research so for now it's just a hypothesis, but definitely one to follow. There's a website (http://www.eyethink.org/index.html) but it doesn't seem to contain any more information, probably because this is for an ongoing PhD. I hope they'll put out a press release when the paper/thesis is published.
"Group conformity stands in marked contrast to the “wisdom of crowds” effect, whereby aggregating the opinions of large numbers of people gives answers or predictions more accurate than those of any individual. This happens only when members of a crowd make their judgements independently of each other, and it is most effective when a crowd is diverse. In cohesive groups, on the other hand, where members share an identity, the urge for unity overrides all. So when Richardson presents us with a picture of a killer whale and asks us how much the creature weighs, he’ll be better off taking the average of the answers we give independently, rather than following the scramble of dots on the screen."
Sounds like stuff I've been saying for a while, and well worth testing.
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20160113-are-your-opinions-really-your-own
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Where Americans think Ukraine is These are the guesses of 2066 Americans as to where Ukraine is. Only 1 in 6 were correct. Presumably the... -
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
-
Of course you can prove a negative. In one sense this can be the easiest thing in the world : your theory predicts something which doesn...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Due to a small but consistent influx of spam, comments will now be checked before publishing. Only egregious spam/illegal/racist crap will be disapproved, everything else will be published.