"Let's design a search engine that's safe for kids. Like, making it impossible to search for offensive content".
Oh what could possibly go wrong...
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-35694883
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whose cloud is it anyway ?
I really don't understand the most militant climate activists who are also opposed to geoengineering . Or rather, I think I understand t...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
For all that I know the Universe is under no obligation to make intuitive sense, I still don't like quantum mechanics. Just because some...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
"Safe for kids" is an oxymoron, at least when it comes to information. More like, "won't cause the parents discomfort when they find out what their kids already know."
ReplyDeleteMay it go the path of Net Nanny.
On the contrary, Lilith von Fraumench, a system like Net Nanny is exactly what's needed - if it can be made to work. The alternative is much, much worse.
ReplyDeletehttp://astrorhysy.blogspot.cz/2015/05/perverts-of-carribean.html
Considering that "transgender" was blocked as a bad word in Net Nanny, and so does Kiddle, I must respectfully disagree. The Internet saved me back in the early 90s because it was the only place at the time where I could find other trans people. I worry about young trans people being stuck in bad homes and unable to reach out online. While I understand the appeal of having a "kid-safe" Internet, I'm far less happy with what many consider "unsafe" to start.
ReplyDelete