So, this entire Collection has been pithily dismissed as "unfortunate" (plus.google.com/u/0/+JohnVerdon-JohnVerdon/posts/JohWg2kB7Fp). I'm not sure that's better or worse than the time I was personally accused of being a fraud on account of thinking that philosophy actually matters for doing science.
I've said it before and I'll say it again : the beliefs of science are evidence-based and provisional. You're allowed to make unproven assumptions, but you have to be aware that these are assumptions. If you're going to assume that the Universe is a purely mechanical, physics-driven place where everything can be explained by laws, that is a belief, an assumption, even a philosophy. It's a necessary one for the scientific method, but it's still damn hard - perhaps impossible - to rigorously prove. You may fairly claim that you can't prove a negative... in which case congratulations, you're doing philosophy.
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
These things are not the same as these other things
Today, a couple of similar-ish pieces from Pscyhe I think I can get away with combining into a single post. The first one is very simple, d...
-
This is nice video which attempts to solve why the world is sometimes such a crappy place and obvious solutions don't get implemented. I...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
Three rules for any article on AI : 1) AI does not yet have the the same kind of understanding as human intelligence. 2) There is no guar...
I would note that anything that actually makes a difference in the world is, by virtue of making that difference, observable.
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't have to obey our current understanding of physics, and it may be fiendishly difficult to get precise or reproducible measurements, but if it causes change in the world we can observe that change and try to understand it.
Yup, that.
ReplyDelete