Basically, teach people by letting them think for themselves rather than being an authority figure.
"Students are not empty vessels," he says. "Students are full of all kinds of knowledge, and they have explanations for everything." From birth, human beings are working hard to figure out the world around us.
But we go about it more like the early Greek philosophers than modern scientists: reasoning from our limited experience. And like those early philosophers — Ptolemy comes to mind — we're often dead wrong. Sadler says that cognitive science tells us that if you don't understand the flaws in students' reasoning, you're not going to be able to dislodge their misconceptions and replace them with the correct concepts.
The first step, Sadler says, is to teach Socratically (there's the Greeks again), by asking questions and having students think out loud. This works much better than lecturing. "Teachers who find their kids' ideas fascinating are just better teachers than teachers who find the subject matter fascinating," he says.
The next step is to give students exposure to the information and experience that will enable them to reason their way to the right answer. For example, Sadler and colleagues created a high school astronomy course. In one of the lessons, students looked at pictures of the sun taken through the same telescope at each month of the year. Most predicted that the sun would appear larger in the hot months. However, once they got out the rulers, they would discover that the sun is biggest (i.e., closest) in January. (The closest point in our orbit, the "perihelion," was Jan. 2 this year.)
"That throws a monkey wrench into the logic of the elliptical orbit," says Sadler.
http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2016/08/01/481422876/the-importance-of-getting-things-wrong?sc=ipad&f=1001
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whose cloud is it anyway ?
I really don't understand the most militant climate activists who are also opposed to geoengineering . Or rather, I think I understand t...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
For all that I know the Universe is under no obligation to make intuitive sense, I still don't like quantum mechanics. Just because some...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
Yes, and the best way to do this is through scientific controversies. This is why I'm building out a controversy taxonomy: The point is not so much to teach controversies, but to help people to become better thinkers by involving them in the act of contemplating the same observation from two competing worldviews.
ReplyDeleteWe hit 100 controversy cards this week, and I will not begin constructing the social network until we've hit 300 or 400 ...
Controversies of Science
https://plus.google.com/collection/Yhn4Y
Chris Reeve Cool page, following.
ReplyDeleteAlso, are you Superman??? ;-)