Despite its dependence on hard evidence, science is a creative discipline. That creativity needs nurturing, even in this age of performance targets and impact assessments. Scientist need to flex their imaginations, too.
[Under normal circumstances, scientific speculation is confined by both the prevailing wisdom and the available evidence. If it were not, it would be "so open its brains fell out" and not have a hope of making progress. But when an impasses is reached, when it is clear that a theory cannot be correct, no matter how well-accepted it is, then and only then does imagination get free reign.]
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23331153-800-to-advance-science-we-need-to-think-about-the-impossible/
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review : Ordinary Men
As promised last time I'm going to do a more thorough review of Christopher Browning's Ordinary Men . I already mentioned the Netf...
-
This is nice video which attempts to solve why the world is sometimes such a crappy place and obvious solutions don't get implemented. I...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
Three rules for any article on AI : 1) AI does not yet have the the same kind of understanding as human intelligence. 2) There is no guar...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Due to a small but consistent influx of spam, comments will now be checked before publishing. Only egregious spam/illegal/racist crap will be disapproved, everything else will be published.