Apparently it can spot sharks with a 92% reliability rate. Now, as I understand the term "reliability", that means that 92% of the things it identifies as sharks will actually be sharks. Which is quite different from saying that it has a completeness of 92%, in which it manages to spot 92% of the sharks present.
Also, it can drop a floatation aid to help swimmers. Very good, but this means the next version of Baywatch will have the lowest ratings of any TV show ever.
http://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-australia-41640146/a-bird-s-eye-view-of-sharks
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
These things are not the same as these other things
Today, a couple of similar-ish pieces from Pscyhe I think I can get away with combining into a single post. The first one is very simple, d...
-
This is nice video which attempts to solve why the world is sometimes such a crappy place and obvious solutions don't get implemented. I...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
Three rules for any article on AI : 1) AI does not yet have the the same kind of understanding as human intelligence. 2) There is no guar...
Wait 'til the sharks have anti-drone "L.A.S.E.R beams" attached to their heads.
ReplyDelete