Fascinating stuff !
The slime mold Physarum polycephalum sometimes barely qualifies as a microorganism at all: When it oozes across the leaf litter of a forest floor during the active, amoeboid stage of its life cycle, it can look like a puddle of yellowish goo between an inch and a meter across. Yet despite its size, Physarum is a huge single cell, with tens of thousands of nuclei floating in an uninterrupted mass of cytoplasm. In this form, Physarum is a superbly efficient hunter. When sensors on its cell membrane detect good sources of nutrients, contractile networks of proteins (closely related to the ones found in human muscle) start pumping streams of cytoplasm in that direction, advancing the slime mold toward what it needs.
But Physarum is not just reflexively surging toward food. As it moves in one direction, signals transmitted throughout the cell discourage it from pushing counterproductively along less promising routes. Moreover, slime molds have evolved a system for essentially mapping their terrain and memorizing where not to go: As they move, they leave a translucent chemical trail behind that tells them which areas are not worth revisiting.
Within the biofilm, the bacteria divide the labor of maintaining the colony and differentiate into forms specialized for their function. In this biofilm of the common soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis, for example, some cells secrete extracellular matrix and anchor in place, while some stay motile; cells at the edges of the biofilm may divide for growth, while others in the middle release spores for surviving tough conditions and colonizing new locations.
Biofilm behaviors testify to the capacity and openness of bacterial to form collectives — but that openness has limits, as shown in this culture with several cohabiting biofilms. Here, adjacent biofilms that consist of the same bacteria or closely related strains comfortably merge. But the adjacent biofilms made up of more divergent bacteria keep themselves distinct and may even try to eliminate or control each other.
“The blue pigment seen in this video is actinorhodin, which is technically an antibiotic,” Chimileski said, but added that the term is misleading in this context. “Killing or growth inhibition usually occurs only at very high concentrations relative to what is out in nature.” For that reason, he said, there is “an emerging view that killing is probably not the ecological function of many or most antibiotics. Rather, these bioactive molecules act as signals or developmental cues” to other cells.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-beautiful-intelligence-of-bacteria-and-other-microbes-20171113/
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whose cloud is it anyway ?
I really don't understand the most militant climate activists who are also opposed to geoengineering . Or rather, I think I understand t...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
For all that I know the Universe is under no obligation to make intuitive sense, I still don't like quantum mechanics. Just because some...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
The core of Enceladus is now thought to be porous and moist. Might it harbor a substantial colony of microbes?
ReplyDeleteBrian Fitzgerald It might. Heck many of the gas giant's moons have subsurface regions that permit liquid water. The question is, is there enough of an entropy gradient to drive life?
ReplyDeleteWe rely on a steady flux of yummy blue low entropy photons to push reactions along - and reradiate the same energy, but at higher entropy. Under 100km of rock and ice, I wonder how things might work.
I think there is not so much of a question as to whether life could currently exist at the bottom of an ocean of an ice moon (hydrothermal vents on Earth demonstrate that pretty well), but more as to whether it could start there in the first place. While it seems to be able to adapt and survive almost anywhere - deep in the crust, bottom of the ocean, alkaline lakes, acid lakes, you name it - there seems much less consensus as to whether these extreme environments are also suitable places for it to begin.
ReplyDeleteRhys Taylor And then there's the 'vent hypothesis' (HVTs were the primordial soup bowl).
ReplyDeleteCouldabeen, couldabeen.
Where I wonder about this for smaller worlds, is the timescale over which they could sustain gradients steep enough for 'proper' chemistry.
Mmm. The point about magma chambers acting as localizations of tidal strain - they flex and so dissipate heat nicely - is a cute idea.
Okay - I'm sold. Submarines to Enceladus! Nuclear Philberth probes to get through the surface and then it's cat.V planetary protection regs to deal with the locals.
A small reactor once used in Greenland for drilling ice holes is less than five miles from me, and has been there for about 50 years. It is used for teaching now. A casino and several hotels are being built around it.
ReplyDelete