This is probably one of the least offensive things he's done, but still, a lawsuit's a lawsuit.
Donald Drumpf's attempt to dismiss a lawsuit alleging ownership of his business empire while president is a violation of the US constitution has been rejected by a federal judge. He is accused of breaching the constitution's emoluments clause, which prohibits the receipt of gifts without congressional approval.
The lawsuit includes allegations that Mr Drumpf's position puts other hotel and entertainment properties nearby at a competitive disadvantage, and that the Drumpf hotel has received special tax concessions. Shortly before he became president, Mr Drumpf stepped down from running the company. He transferred the business into a revocable trust, one he can receive money from at his request.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43577444
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whose cloud is it anyway ?
I really don't understand the most militant climate activists who are also opposed to geoengineering . Or rather, I think I understand t...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
For all that I know the Universe is under no obligation to make intuitive sense, I still don't like quantum mechanics. Just because some...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
I don't think we should just ignore the constitution.
ReplyDeleteThis is a flagrant and easily provable breach of the rules. Even though I may have hopes for Mueller’s investigation, this one absolutely needs to go forward and has a better chance of striking its target.
ReplyDelete