Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby

Thursday 15 March 2018

Facebook gets serious about preventing violent extremism

I'm going to quote the entire story without comment, but give it a proper paragraph structure, because the BBC just don't seem to understand how to do that.


Facebook has removed the pages of the anti-Islamic group Britain First and its leaders. The social media company said the group had repeatedly violated its community standards.

Earlier this month, Britain First's leader and deputy leader, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen, were jailed after being found guilty of religiously aggravated harassment. More than two million people had liked the group's Facebook page. The pages of Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen also had large followings.

Facebook says the decision to remove the pages was made after Britain First had ignored a final warning about the posting of material that broke its community standards. The group will not be allowed to set up a replacement page. It is understood that Facebook judged the videos and photos to be designed to incite hatred against Muslims.

Prime Minister Theresa May told the House of Commons that she welcomed the move and hoped other tech companies would follow. London's mayor, Sadiq Khan has also issued a statement. "Britain First is a vile and hate-fuelled group," he said. "Their sick intentions to incite hatred within our society via social media are reprehensible, and Facebook's decision to remove their content is welcome."

It is understood the offending posts included:
- a photo of the group's leaders with the caption "Islamophobic and Proud"
- a caption comparing Muslim immigrants with animals
- multiple videos posted deliberately to incite hateful comments against Muslims
In a blog, Facebook said it was an open platform for all ideas but that political views should be expressed without hate. "People can express robust and controversial opinions without needing to denigrate others on the basis of who they are."

There has been pressure for some time on Facebook to act against Britain First. The social media company says it removes hate speech against people based on their race, religion, gender and other characteristics. Its community standards document states: "Organisations and people dedicated to promoting hatred against these protected groups are not allowed a presence on Facebook."

Twitter suspended the accounts of Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen, after its new anti-abuse rules came into force last December. US President Donald Drumpf had retweeted anti-Islamic videos posted by Fransen the previous month.
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-43398417

2 comments:

  1. Will they have to register in the Lout Registry upon release?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, good on Facebook I guess. However, they actively aid and support some of the worst actors.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-12-21/inside-the-facebook-team-helping-regimes-that-reach-out-and-crack-down

    'In the U.S., the unit embedded employees in Trump’s campaign. (Hillary Clinton’s camp declined a similar offer.) In India, the company helped develop the online presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who now has more Facebook followers than any other world leader. In the Philippines, it trained the campaign of Rodrigo Duterte, known for encouraging extrajudicial killings, in how to most effectively use the platform. And in Germany it helped the anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany party (AfD) win its first Bundestag seats, according to campaign staff.'

    They're not just a simple platform, they explicitly are providing advice to organizations on how to maximize their effectiveness in spreading lies. Which, when you're talking about corporations selling ads is one thing, when you're dealing with political parties with the power to jail and execute people, I feel it makes you culpable for the damage they wreak.

    ReplyDelete

Due to a small but consistent influx of spam, comments will now be checked before publishing. Only egregious spam/illegal/racist crap will be disapproved, everything else will be published.

These things are not the same as these other things

Today, a couple of similar-ish pieces from Pscyhe I think I can get away with combining into a single post. The first one is very simple, d...