A team of researchers, including Carnegie Mellon University assistant professor Simon DeDeo, used machine learning to analyze more than 40,000 digitized transcripts from the first two years of debates of the first makeshift French parliament, during the beginning of the revolution.
"The first thing that really came out and surprised us was that you can distinguish left and right not by what they're saying, but by how they're saying it," DeDeo said.
The study found liberal revolutionaries were more likely to use novel turns of phrase to talk about new ideas, and they also did more discussion derailing. "So you have these really charismatic people who are essentially the rudders of revolution," he said. "They're steering this conversation about how to run France into directions that nobody's ever seen."
http://wesa.fm/post/computer-analyzing-parliamentary-speeches-understand-how-french-revolution-started#stream/0
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whose cloud is it anyway ?
I really don't understand the most militant climate activists who are also opposed to geoengineering . Or rather, I think I understand t...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
For all that I know the Universe is under no obligation to make intuitive sense, I still don't like quantum mechanics. Just because some...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Due to a small but consistent influx of spam, comments will now be checked before publishing. Only egregious spam/illegal/racist crap will be disapproved, everything else will be published.