Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Thursday, 10 May 2018
The scientific business model
An unfortunate reality. Some significant caveats however :
- Some journals require no or minimum payment per paper, funded instead by institutional subscriptions.
- Payment for access also funds the process of finding the reviewers. This isn't such a minor thing (witness that peer-reviewed paper about the time travelling alien octopus).
- Access doesn't always require payment, since virtually identical versions can be found on arXiv.
- While reviewing is done by other scientists, it's not really the case that they review it for free. Most institutes accept that reviewing is an essential and unavoidable part of the job, so reviewing is done on work time. Hence reviewers are getting paid for this - they're sacrificing their own research time, not salary.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review : Matilda
I picked up Catherine Hanley's Matilda : Empress, Queen, Warrior in the gift shop of Durham Cathedral. Quite what the connection is wit...
-
Where Americans think Ukraine is These are the guesses of 2066 Americans as to where Ukraine is. Only 1 in 6 were correct. Presumably the...
-
Of course you can prove a negative. In one sense this can be the easiest thing in the world : your theory predicts something which doesn...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Due to a small but consistent influx of spam, comments will now be checked before publishing. Only egregious spam/illegal/racist crap will be disapproved, everything else will be published.