Another exploration of talent-luck :
https://repl.it/@RhysTaylor1/TalentVersusLuck
This time I kept all the conditions the same as in the original paper, with talent playing an almost negligible role when events happen, but simply changed the distribution of talent from Gaussian to random uniform. This means there are now far more people with high and low talent levels, and the final distribution of talent-wealth is completely different. Remarkably, the slope of the wealth distribution is unchanged, though the most talented people are now also the most wealthy. It seems the original model really does give talent the worst possible chance !
The next step is to see if I can improve speed by replacing the strange random-walk method. I'll try and measure the frequency distribution of events, then have force them to occur at that rate for each agent. There might be a nice little paper in this...
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review : Human Kind
I suppose I really should review Bregman's Human Kind : A Hopeful History , though I'm not sure I want to. This was a deeply frustra...
-
This is nice video which attempts to solve why the world is sometimes such a crappy place and obvious solutions don't get implemented. I...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
Three rules for any article on AI : 1) AI does not yet have the the same kind of understanding as human intelligence. 2) There is no guar...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Due to a small but consistent influx of spam, comments will now be checked before publishing. Only egregious spam/illegal/racist crap will be disapproved, everything else will be published.