Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby

Sunday, 20 January 2019

What is life ?

Under any rational analysis it becomes apparent that living systems are not different in any fundamental way from the (notionally inorganic) patterns and processes of information and energy from which biology has emerged.

Discuss.

Originally shared by Event Horizon

Life is notoriously difficult to pin down and unambiguously define. Attempts to identify a unique set of essential or universal characteristics in living systems beyond generalised dynamical and logical patterns or material tendencies has proven serially problematic. Under any rational analysis it becomes apparent that living systems are not different in any fundamental way from the (notionally inorganic) patterns and processes of information and energy from which biology has emerged. The points of difference between organic and inorganic systems are generally reducible to factors composed in various ways of an essential orientation towards self-interested material continuity. The degree to which such an orientation and bias towards self-propagation is an emergent property of the logic and grammar of physics is perhaps only in our contemporary era becoming transparently self-evident but still finds itself as a principle in search of extensive articulation and popular communication beyond a scientific or specialist community.

What at a cognitive or subjective level appears as self-interested behaviour may also be the simple aggregate behavioural or complexity in material emergence of many sub-systems and material processes which each in their own way maintain (or autonomously seek) continuity through an interdependent gestalt of activity. If self-propagation is an axiomatic bias of physics or material systems; and the complex recombinatory activity of those systems provides fertile opportunity for the emergence, cultivation and production of further iteratively refined self-propagating patterns; then all emergent activity and behaviour in material, cognitive, cultural and technological systems is in essence a fractally self-replicating pattern of this axiomatic bias towards systems self-replication.

The essence of this is that all patterns of information and energy which exist (as expressed through physics) are biased towards the self-replication and self-propagation of those same patterns; the emergence of overtly biological systems is merely a branching of this same elementary logical pivot and bias towards the self-replication and self-propagation of systems continuity. The method and morphology of systems and systemic self-replication may not always be obvious but it remains as a material fact of the expression and instantiation or manifestation of the laws of physics and an underlying mathematical logic.

2 comments:

  1. Erm... no. Every time I hear words such as "rational" and especially "fundamental", my bullshit detector goes off immediately.

    The essence of this is that all patterns of information and energy which exist (as expressed through physics) are biased towards the self-replication and self-propagation

    NO. They are biassed towards entropy. The Bag of Chemicals explanation will not suffice for life. I am more than an ingredients list. I've said this before: Laplace's Demon is easily chased off. Just ask his dumb ass where all the electrons are. If anything, I am an electrochemical beast.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Something related from MIT 2014, technically ancient history under current information metrics or frequency diminution, but interesting:
    https://www.businessinsider.com/groundbreaking-idea-of-lifes-origin-2014-12?IR=T

    ReplyDelete

Due to a small but consistent influx of spam, comments will now be checked before publishing. Only egregious spam/illegal/racist crap will be disapproved, everything else will be published.

Whose cloud is it anyway ?

I really don't understand the most militant climate activists who are also opposed to geoengineering . Or rather, I think I understand t...