Note the y-axis doesn't start from zero and that this is irrelevant. |
Found on the internet.
231,556,622 eligible voters
46.9% didn't vote
25.6% voted for Clinton
25.5% voted for Trump
1.7% voted for Johnson
I really don't understand the most militant climate activists who are also opposed to geoengineering . Or rather, I think I understand t...
When the typical Clinton voter was saying on all my feeds "Well, sure, she's corrupt, secretive, really a closet Republican, in the pocket of Wall Street, primarily responsible for the Iraq war, and she's not as awesome as Bernie (who we should have voted for but those stupid southern states didn't agree with us 'cause the DNC is corrupt), but at least she isn't as bad as Trump. Probably. You should totally vote though." I can't say I'm particularly surprised by this.
ReplyDeleteWhy are those catastrophic presidents keep being elected by a minority?
ReplyDeleteSeriously US, if you had updated your presidential election system, you could still mock Germans, Italians or Hungarians about how they voted for such a guy, really, Old Worlders, you couldn't tell?
Elie Thorne my pardon. I misread your comment. It's been a very bad day.
ReplyDeleteWhat Cong Ma says.
ReplyDeleteIf you wanted to compare the absolute number of votes cast, then yes, not starting from zero is lousy. If you want to compare how close the results were, then starting from zero would make things harder to read.
ReplyDeleteRhys Taylor, remember, never use a cutoff bar chart, even when appropriate, because pendants will argue about that rather than the data.
ReplyDelete