A very interesting and novel study examining the effects of strongly nonlinear impact dynamics and unwarranted statistical extrapolations. A late entry, but the best paper I've read all year, hands down. Worth reading in its entirety including the acknowledgements.
https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Black holes belay bird Bentleys
Following that marvellous Aeon piece on how Phineas Gage didn't suffer a horrible personality disorder after taking a bolt to the brain...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
-
Where Americans think Ukraine is These are the guesses of 2066 Americans as to where Ukraine is. Only 1 in 6 were correct. Presumably the...
-
"The price quoted by Tesla does not include installation of the unit. To this needs to be added the cost of installing solar panels to ...
This study is very suspicious: It doesn't appear to be blinded or double blinded. Did the participants know whether they had a parachute?
ReplyDeleteThere doesn't seem to be any control s in the unenrolled group! That will create a classic cass of "survival bias". Its possible parachute s are detrimental, but we can't tell unless some unenrolled people get backpack s.
Even knowing whether one is a researcher or subject should skew outcomes. Ideally some random amount of the participants should be convinced they are they researchers --- and then added to the unenrolled cohort , with backpack s. That should fix any of methodological bubbears.