A very interesting and novel study examining the effects of strongly nonlinear impact dynamics and unwarranted statistical extrapolations. A late entry, but the best paper I've read all year, hands down. Worth reading in its entirety including the acknowledgements.
https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094
Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whose cloud is it anyway ?
I really don't understand the most militant climate activists who are also opposed to geoengineering . Or rather, I think I understand t...
-
"To claim that you are being discriminated against because you have lost your right to discriminate against others shows a gross lack o...
-
For all that I know the Universe is under no obligation to make intuitive sense, I still don't like quantum mechanics. Just because some...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
This study is very suspicious: It doesn't appear to be blinded or double blinded. Did the participants know whether they had a parachute?
ReplyDeleteThere doesn't seem to be any control s in the unenrolled group! That will create a classic cass of "survival bias". Its possible parachute s are detrimental, but we can't tell unless some unenrolled people get backpack s.
Even knowing whether one is a researcher or subject should skew outcomes. Ideally some random amount of the participants should be convinced they are they researchers --- and then added to the unenrolled cohort , with backpack s. That should fix any of methodological bubbears.