Interesting :
Of the countries included in the study, 30 have passed laws fully banning physical punishment of children, both in schools and in homes. The rates of fighting among adolescents were substantially lower than in the 20 countries with no bans in place: by 69 percent for adolescent males and 42 percent less for females.
The other 38 countries in the study — which include the United States, Canada, and the U.K. — have partial bans, in schools only. In those countries, adolescent females showed a 56 percent lower rate of physical fighting, with no change among males.
The association held true even after accounting for such factors as the differences in the wealth of the countries and the nation's homicide rates, said Elgar. Even so, Elgar cautions, the study shows a correlation only, not a cause and effect.
"It could be that bans come into place in countries that have already generally accepted that spanking is not the best discipline method," he said, or there may be other cultural factors involved. "We haven't answered with certainty" the impact of the bans, he says, noting that more research is needed.
I propose we test this with two groups of politicians...
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2018/10/25/660191806/what-happens-when-a-country-bans-spanking
It’s really hard (if not impossible) to figure out if fighting went down as a consequence of the ban, or of the social norm change that drove/allowed the ban.
ReplyDeleteThe “test it on the politicians” suggestion is bound to produce invalid results: you’ve essentially proposed “physical punishment” vs. “no rules&discipline whatsoever” (which is the current round-the-world norm).
... against that, it would be highly amusing.
ReplyDeleteRhys Taylor panem et circenses ;-)
ReplyDelete