Sister blog of Physicists of the Caribbean in which I babble about non-astronomy stuff, because everyone needs a hobby
Thursday, 31 December 2015
Rebooted franchises
I remembered a quote that summarises how I feel about rebooted movies franchises when the director doesn't really get it : the alleged last oracle of Delphi to Justinian the Apostate. Justinian tried with a vengeance to reinstate worship of the old Roman gods. He may even have really believed in them, few others did. The old gods were effectively dead, and no amount of effort could ever bring them back. It's an uneasy sense of tragedy, like seeing fake Roman ruins in the grounds of an English stately home, or an 18th century painting showing the old myths with modern eyes. The artists were trying desperately to capture a sense of lost mysticism that they could never really understand at more than a superficial level. The vital essence of what the old beliefs meant has been lost forever.
Melodrama over, that's what I think when I watch the latest attempts to reboot almost all TV and especially movie franchises. Notable exceptions : Doctor Who, which if not exactly like the original does feel like a logical evolution from it, the fundamental morality of the show remains unchanged; Spectre, which feels to me like a modern version of the classic Bond films (unlike Casino Royale, haven't seen the other Craig films yet) - not exactly the same, but still fundamentally Bond. Also the Nolan Batman films, though those are remakes rather than attempting to continue the story.
Abrams, for me, is the worst offender. I rather enjoyed Super 8, which was his own original work, but when he tries doing Star Trek and Star Wars it really is like he's trying to hear the voice of a dead god. The soul of the films has gone. This was also true of Indiana Jones IV, Terminator IV (and to a lesser extent Terminator III), Stargate Universe and in some ways also The Hobbit (although I might attribute that to poor management rather than the director(s) not really getting it).
Rant over, you may go about your business now.
Solar Sahara
The short version : yes, except wars and politicians.
The last comment is silly though. If you can generate all the energy needed through renewables, reducing energy consumption makes no sense. Renewables aren't a "stopgap", they're the whole point. Low carbon sources would be a stopgap.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-34987467
The last comment is silly though. If you can generate all the energy needed through renewables, reducing energy consumption makes no sense. Renewables aren't a "stopgap", they're the whole point. Low carbon sources would be a stopgap.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-34987467
Wednesday, 30 December 2015
Haters gonna hate
For those who were wondering about the status of the UK petition to ban Donald Trump, the official response is now available.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/114003
For good reasons the Government does not routinely comment on individual immigration and exclusion decisions.
The Home Secretary may exclude a non-European Economic Area national from the UK if she considers their presence in the UK to be non-conducive to the public good.
The Home Secretary has said that coming to the UK is a privilege and not a right and she will continue to use the powers available to prevent from entering the UK those who seek to harm our society and who do not share our basic values.
Exclusion powers are very serious and are not used lightly. The Home Secretary will use these powers when justified and based on all available evidence.
The Prime Minister has made clear that he completely disagrees with Donald Trump’s remarks. The Home Secretary has said that Donald Trump’s remarks in relation to Muslims are divisive, unhelpful and wrong.
The Government recognises the strength of feeling against the remarks and will continue to speak out against comments which have the potential to divide our communities, regardless of who makes them. We reject any attempts to create division and marginalisation amongst those we endeavour to protect.
Doesn't really say much. It will still be considered for a debate in Parliament, but my guess is that it won't happen. However, "does not routinely comment" does not mean, "never comments". With over half a million signatuure, a more direct response as to whether Donald will be barred or not is warranted.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/114003
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/114003
For good reasons the Government does not routinely comment on individual immigration and exclusion decisions.
The Home Secretary may exclude a non-European Economic Area national from the UK if she considers their presence in the UK to be non-conducive to the public good.
The Home Secretary has said that coming to the UK is a privilege and not a right and she will continue to use the powers available to prevent from entering the UK those who seek to harm our society and who do not share our basic values.
Exclusion powers are very serious and are not used lightly. The Home Secretary will use these powers when justified and based on all available evidence.
The Prime Minister has made clear that he completely disagrees with Donald Trump’s remarks. The Home Secretary has said that Donald Trump’s remarks in relation to Muslims are divisive, unhelpful and wrong.
The Government recognises the strength of feeling against the remarks and will continue to speak out against comments which have the potential to divide our communities, regardless of who makes them. We reject any attempts to create division and marginalisation amongst those we endeavour to protect.
Doesn't really say much. It will still be considered for a debate in Parliament, but my guess is that it won't happen. However, "does not routinely comment" does not mean, "never comments". With over half a million signatuure, a more direct response as to whether Donald will be barred or not is warranted.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/114003
Tuesday, 29 December 2015
The Force Awak... well, not really
Spoiler-free review of The Force Awakens. I'm not sure it's possible to spoil a bad film though.
Jar Jar Abrahams Wants To Kill My Childhood And This Is Odd Because I Never Did Anything To Him As Far As I Know
OK, that's enough of the "virtues of critical thinking" and "oh isn't moderation just wonderful" posts. Nope, I'm going on a merciless ad hominem attack rant that will achieve precisely nothing but I don't care, you can't stop me, and it's Christmas. So there. J. J. Abrams knows diddly-squat about good storytelling.
Billie Piper's music video was a prelude to Doctor Who
OK, this is too much of a coincidence....
Billie Piper first shot to fame with a mercifully short-lived singing career. In this video she's brought to Earth by a (presumably Dalek) saucer and proceeds to splash what is quite clearly regeneration energy all over the place. Trash cans (albeit metal, not plastic) and drawings come to life. THEN A JUDOON APPEARS I KID THEE NOT.
I therefore move that this musical catastrophe (I watched it on mute and I suggest you do the same) must be accepted as Doctor Who canon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_XI_290cfw
Billie Piper first shot to fame with a mercifully short-lived singing career. In this video she's brought to Earth by a (presumably Dalek) saucer and proceeds to splash what is quite clearly regeneration energy all over the place. Trash cans (albeit metal, not plastic) and drawings come to life. THEN A JUDOON APPEARS I KID THEE NOT.
I therefore move that this musical catastrophe (I watched it on mute and I suggest you do the same) must be accepted as Doctor Who canon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_XI_290cfw
Monday, 28 December 2015
River Song's SPOILERS
SPOILERS
... if you haven't watched the latest Christmas special, don't watch this !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-wgLFj6bbI
... if you haven't watched the latest Christmas special, don't watch this !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-wgLFj6bbI
Sunday, 27 December 2015
Those cheeky Welsh
Genius, via a certain Gregg Taylor but G+ won't let me select the correct Gregg.
http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/12/24/460558347/a-cheeky-welsh-town-goes-offshore-to-avoid-british-taxes
http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/12/24/460558347/a-cheeky-welsh-town-goes-offshore-to-avoid-british-taxes
Tuesday, 22 December 2015
J. J. Abrahams, I've got words for you...
J. J. Abrahams, you are now dead to me. This time, I'm spelling your name incorrectly deliberately.
Monday, 21 December 2015
Why are people stupid ?
On Stupidity
Feeling ambitious, I've decided to attempt to tackle the chronic question : why are people so stupid ? If it's a case of TLDR, you can probably skip to the summary section safely enough.
The super-short version is that evolution has not exactly favoured the development of general, overall intelligence. It favoured those who were good at solving specific problems, which is not quite the same thing. Those who appeared confident of their ability to kill a mammoth probably did know quite a lot about mammoth-killing, because if they didn't they wouldn't survive long enough to reproduce. Confidence and knowledge once went hand in hand - in the modern world, there is far less selection pressure against over-confident idiots.
But evolution has given us a capacity for general problem-solving, and it is possible at least to some extent to be taught critical thinking. It doesn't always come naturally to us for very good evolutionary reasons, but one can become more intelligent through good teaching, though perhaps only to a point. People sometimes reach stupid conclusions even though they are genuinely very intelligent, so it's important to consider their thought processes before deciding if they are truly stupid or not.
Finally, expertise should be regarded as a sign of ability, not actual intelligence. In the same way you wouldn't regard a professional sports player as necessarily all that smart, so, perhaps, you shouldn't regard scientists as being particularly intelligent. People simply have different abilities and different areas of expertise.
Absolutely none of which has helped me to explain why this guy is biting a tiger's tail, so some work remains.
Drawing this to the particular attention of Christopher Butler and William Black, who I know spend a lot of time dealing with (possibly) very stupid people.
Feeling ambitious, I've decided to attempt to tackle the chronic question : why are people so stupid ? If it's a case of TLDR, you can probably skip to the summary section safely enough.
The super-short version is that evolution has not exactly favoured the development of general, overall intelligence. It favoured those who were good at solving specific problems, which is not quite the same thing. Those who appeared confident of their ability to kill a mammoth probably did know quite a lot about mammoth-killing, because if they didn't they wouldn't survive long enough to reproduce. Confidence and knowledge once went hand in hand - in the modern world, there is far less selection pressure against over-confident idiots.
But evolution has given us a capacity for general problem-solving, and it is possible at least to some extent to be taught critical thinking. It doesn't always come naturally to us for very good evolutionary reasons, but one can become more intelligent through good teaching, though perhaps only to a point. People sometimes reach stupid conclusions even though they are genuinely very intelligent, so it's important to consider their thought processes before deciding if they are truly stupid or not.
Finally, expertise should be regarded as a sign of ability, not actual intelligence. In the same way you wouldn't regard a professional sports player as necessarily all that smart, so, perhaps, you shouldn't regard scientists as being particularly intelligent. People simply have different abilities and different areas of expertise.
Absolutely none of which has helped me to explain why this guy is biting a tiger's tail, so some work remains.
Drawing this to the particular attention of Christopher Butler and William Black, who I know spend a lot of time dealing with (possibly) very stupid people.
Sunday, 20 December 2015
Early regulations
They're going to need a man walking in front of them waving a red flag, in case they scare the horses.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35131538
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35131538
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Review : Epic Slavic Myths
Following a now well-established procedure, after that delightful but short offering from Thames & Hudson , I turn to a longer collecti...
-
Hmmm. [The comments below include a prime example of someone claiming they're interested in truth but just want higher standard, where...
-
"The price quoted by Tesla does not include installation of the unit. To this needs to be added the cost of installing solar panels to ...
-
Of course you can prove a negative. In one sense this can be the easiest thing in the world : your theory predicts something which doesn...
